DeepBlackLies Bringing in-depth reporting of crime and corruption in high places____________________________________________________________________   Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence by John J. McMurtrey, M. S.[a], Copyright 2003, 23 Dec. 2003[b] People discerning remote manipulation by technology capable of such influence have formed protest organizations across the world.[1] [2] [3] [4] Educated society is uninformed regarding authentic documentation of the development and existence of these technologies, and unaware of the dangers. Complaint of ‘hearing voices’ and perception of other remote manipulation must receive appropriate scientific and legal investigation with protection. Professional awareness is virtually absent with eminent texts and opinion being presumptuous, without appraisal of the evidence.Herein is substantiated:1. Human wireless internal voice transmission and tracking technologies.2. Reports of electroencephalographic (EEG) thought reading capacity, evidence of covertdevelopment, and remote EEG capture technology.3. References to the use of these, or similar technologies against humans.MICROWAVE HEARINGThe first American[c] [5] to publish on the microwave hearing effect was Allan H. Frey in 1962,[6] yet radar technicians had anecdotes of microwave perception in World War II.[7] Deaf andnormal subjects, even with earplugs, can hear appropriately pulsed microwaves at least up tothousands of feet from the transmitter.[8] Transmitter parameters above those producing theeffect result in a severe buffeting of the head with dizziness and nausea, while parametersbelow the effect induce a pins and needles sensation. Peak power is the major determinant ofloudness, though there is some dependence on pulse width. Pulse modulation appears toinfluence pitch and timbre. The effect “is the most easily and reliably replicated of low powerdensity (microwave) illumination.” [9] Review of human and animal microwave hearingconfirmation by independent investigators of the effect establishes validity.[10] [11] [12] [13][14] Designs for scaring birds away from aircraft or other hazards by microwave hearing[15]and induction of vertigo[16] exist.[17] [18]While working for the Advanced Research Projects Agency at Walter Reed Army Institute ofResearch, Sharp and Grove discovered “receiverless” and “wireless” voice transmission. [19]Their method was simple: the negative deflections of voiceprints from recorded spokennumbers were caused to trigger microwave pulses. Upon illumination by such verballymodulated energy, the words were understood remotely. The discovery’s applications are”obviously not limited to therapeutic medicine” according to James C. Lin in MicrowaveAuditory Effects and Applications.[20]A Defense Intelligence Agency review of Communist literature affirmed microwave sound andindicated voice transmission. The report states, “Sounds and possibly even words whichappear to be originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation atvery low average power densities.” [21] Among microwave weapon implications are “greatpotential for development into a system for disorientating or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel.” An Army Mobility Equipment Research and DevelopmentCommand report affirms microwave speech transmission with applications of “camouflage,decoy, and deception operations.” [22] “One decoy and deception concept presently beingconsidered is to remotely create noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to lowpower, pulsed microwaves . . . By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speechmay be created” quotes the report.The Brunkan Patent # 4877027 “Hearing system” is a device capable of verbal microwavehearing. [23] The invention converts speech for remote introduction into the head by parabolicantenna with indication of direct microwave influence on neural activity. The microwavespectrum granted is broad: 100-10,000 MHz (0.1-10 GHz.) Pulse characteristics are essential toperception. Bursts of narrowly grouped, evenly spaced pulses determine sound intensity bytheir amount per unit time. Although a wide spectrum is patented, with ranges of pulse andburst duration, preferred operation has burst duration at 2 microseconds, and pulse duration at100 nanoseconds. Operation is at 1000 MHz, which is the frequency of optimal tissuepenetration.[24] Another patent application based on microwave bursts is “designed in such away that the burst frequencies are at least virtually equal to the sound frequencies of thesounds picked up by the microphone,” though the transducer here is not remote.[25]Stocklin Patent # 4858612 “Hearing device” 7 affirms the microwave hearing effect. Stocklingives exposition to the concept that a microwave component is part of neurophysiology andelectroencephalogram (EEG) potentials.[26] Microwaves are considered both emitted andabsorbed by nerve cell membrane proteins. Microwaves generally excite the brain[27] perhapsby influencing calcium,[28] a central ion in nerve firing.[29] Stocklin represents the auditorycortex as normally producing microwave energy, which the device simulates, thus elicitingsound sensation. Each acoustic tone is weighted for several microwave frequencies by aformula called the mode matrix, which is used to calculate best perception requirements.Observation of EEG desynchronization, delta waves, and brain wave amplitudes helps calibratethe device.[30] The lowest frequency for hearing is estimated by the cephalic index. Microwavespeech transmission in this patent is unremote with the antenna over and sized for the auditorycortex. Other patents have non-remote transducers of radiowave elicited hearing. [31] [32]Descriptions in the above patents attribute microwave hearing to direct neural influence.However, the most accepted mechanism in review is by thermoelastic expansion,12 most likelyinducing bone conducted hearing. The cochlea does appear to be involved, but not the middleear.14 This divergence of mechanism illustrates the non-thermal/thermal controversy. USexposure standards are based on thermal effects, yet there are effects very difficult to explainby thermodynamics.13 [33] All accept thermal effects at some level, yet the thermal onlyschool is rather dogmatic related to liability issues of commercial[34] and national securityconcern.[35] It must be said that the open literature regarding microwave hearing indicates athermo-acoustic mechanism.”Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect.” is the title of a small business contract forthe Department of Defense. Communication initial results are: “The feasibility of the concepthas been established” using both low and high power systems.[36] A Freedom of InformationAct (FOIA) request as to the project’s outcome met with denial on the part of the Air Force, onthe grounds that disclosure “could reasonably be expected to cause damage to nationalsecurity.” [37] Though the Air Force denied the FOIA disclosure, such a contract’s purpose iselaborated by the Air Force’s “New World Vistas” report: “It would also appear possible tocreate high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion andpsychological direction . . . . If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internalacoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible. Thus it may be possible to ‘talk’ toselected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.” [38] Robert Becker,whose eminence was enough to have been twice nominated for the Nobel Prize in biologicalelectromagnetic fields research, is more explicit: “Such a device has obvious applications incovert operations designed to drive a target crazy with “voices” or deliver undetectableinstructions to a programmed assassin.” [39]The above Army efforts had results. A microwave voice transmission non-lethal weapon isreferenced in the thesaurus of the Center for Army Lessons Learned, which is a militaryinstruction website.18 The military thesaurus entry lists analogous devices using “silentsound.” [d] [40]ULTRASOUND TRANSMISSION OF VOICE Internal voice capability, without discernment by others nearby. is also evident in ultrasound-based technology. Lowrey Patent # 6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audiblesound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” clearly focuses on non-lethal weapon applicationagainst crowds or directed at an individual.[41] Communication is understood as an inner voicewith loss of the directional quality of sound perception. “Since most cultures attribute innervoices either as a sign of madness, or as messages from spirits or demons, both of which . . .evoke powerful emotional reactions”, quotes the Lowrey patent’s effect on people. Replayingspeech, with a delay impedes talking and causes stuttering. Normal brain wave patterns can bechanged (or entrained), which “may cause temporary incapacitation, intense feelings ofdiscomfort.” This technique is detailed by Monroe Patent # 5356368 “Method of and apparatusfor inducing desired states of consciousness”, with license to Interstate Industries and involvesan auditory replication of brainwave patterns to entrain the EEG as desired.[42]Norris Patent # 5889870 “Acoustic heterodyne device and method”, directionally producessound on interference (or heterodyning) of two ultrasound beams.[43] The cancellation leavesthe carried audible sound perceivable. The effect becomes apparent particularly within cavitiessuch as the ear canal. An individual readily understands communication across a noisy crowedroom without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or as reflectingfrom any surface.American Technology Corporation, which licensed this patent, has an acoustic non-lethalweapons technology,[44] a cooperative agreement with the Army Research & DevelopmentCommand,[45] and is working with numerous other government agencies.[46] Thecorporation’s Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADTM) account for 60% of military sales, andhave integration into the Navy’s situational awareness & radar surveillance systems[47] withdeployment on naval vessels and fleet harbors.[48] A popular magazine writer describes thedevice’s inner nature of sound perception.[49] From separate references, non-lethal weaponstreatments affirm sound localization and individual ultrasound effect limitation[50] withobvious lack of nearby discernment;[51] the latter by a non-lethal weapons program director. Asimilar ultrasound method of limiting sound to one person, Audio Spotlight is marketed, withexhibition at Boston’s Museum of Science and the Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum.[52] Both the American Technology device and Audio Spotlight are discussed in an article withsome history of ultrasound acoustics, which has origins in sonar.[53] Other acoustic influencemethods may utilize ultrasound.[e] [54]TARGET TRACKING TECHNOLOGYThe maintenance of effects on people requires obstacle penetration and target tracking. Theseinternal voice capable energy forms penetrate obstruction and can be localized. Soundtransmission through enclosures is commonly experienced. An inaudible ultrasound highintensity carrier wave is unnoticed. Solid defect inspection is one use of ultrasound, which isbeing developed to discern movement through walls.[55] Common technology utilizes themicrowave hearing spectrum, which partly or completely encompasses cell phone,[56] [57] TV,and radar frequencies. [58] Commercial signals are not perceived, since the hearing effectrequires pulsation within the limits that elicit perception. A variety of antennae localize thestructurally penetrating microwave illumination with collimation or focusing.[59] [60] A patent,”compatible for mobile platforms with DEWs,” (Directed Energy Weapons) includes a modifiedLuneburg lens emitting parallel rays with over 50 years utilization.[61]Hablov Patent # 5448501 “Electronic life detection system” is for microwave radar within thehearing spectrum that finds and distinguishes individuals through obstruction.[62] Therein isstated: “the modulated component of the reflected microwave signal . . . subjected tofrequency analysis . . . forms a type of “electronic fingerprint” of the living being withcharacteristic features, which . . . permits a distinction between different living beings.” Thoughthis patent has use in trapped victim rescue, another Hablov et. al. Patent # 5530429″Electronic surveillance system” detects interlopers with security emphasis.[63] Other literaturedescribes the basic method.[64]The Hablov et. al. patents discern people thru structures by vital organ motion, but others offermore detailed imaging. Fullerton et. al. Patent # 6400307 “System and method for intrusiondetection using a time domain radar array” is such a design,[65] and is commercially availableas RadarVision by Time Domain. [66] Further designs for imaging within structures include: aportable system determining suspect distance,[67] and presentations by the InternationalSociety for Optical Engineering.[68] [69] Software for displaying radar detection on a personal

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *