The Fraud Of Global Warming Gore

LaRouche P #A #C # www.larouchepac.com The Fraud of Global Warming: True C02 Record Buried Under Gore by Laurence Hecht Editor, 21st Century Science & TechnologyT he historical record of atmospheric carbon dioxide the progress of human industrial civilization. Beck’s work concentrations, claimed by the Intergovernmental confirms a wealth of previous investigations which Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as the justifica- demonstrate that the IPCC cherrypicked its data in antion for greenhouse gas reduction, is a fraud. Research by attempt to prove that we must stop industrial develop-a Freiburg, Germany professor, Ernst-Georg Beck of the ment and return to the horse-and-buggy age, or faceMerian-Schule, shows that the IPCC construed and con- oppressive heat and melting of the polar ice caps. Itcocted the pre-1957 CO2 record from measurements on shows that the Kyoto Treaty on reduction of greenhouserecently drilled ice cores, ignoring more than 90,000 gases was based on a scientific fraud which violates thedirect measurements by chemical methods from 1857 to laws of the universe, denying the well-established deter-1957. [fn. 1] mination of climate by cyclical variations in the Earth- The IPCC’s hoked-up record attempts to prove that Sun orbital relationship and in the Sun’s heat output.CO2 concentrations have been steadily increasing with In a thorough review of 175 scientific papers, CO2 1920-1961, Northern Hemisphere, chemical Ice core Antarctica CO2 chemical 490.0 470.0 450.0 430.0 410.0 CO2 (ppm) 390.0 370.0 350.0 330.0 310.0 290.0 270.0 250.0 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 Year Actual historical CO2 measurements (upper line), and the IPCC values concocted from ice cores—a fable designed to convince you that atmospheric CO2 levels are rising due to industrial activity. Professor Beck found that the founders of modern green- reduction. There are so many interrelated effects, thathouse theory, Guy Stewart Callendar and Charles David correlating global temperature to CO2 concentration isKeeling (a special idol of Al Gore’s), had completely like attempting to predict the value of a hedge fund by theignored careful and systematic measurements by some of phases of the Moon.the most famous names of physical chemistry, among To concoct a convincing case of such correlationthem several Nobel prize winners. Measurements by requires ample, sophisticated lying, and the greenhousethese chemists showed that today’s atmospheric CO2 con- theorists have been caught at it. By a delightful historicalcentration of about 380 parts per million (ppm) have irony, it could be said that it is the founder of modern sci-been exceeded in the past, including a period from 1936 ence, Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464), who hasto 1944, when the CO2 levels varied from 393.0 to 454.7 caught them. Our modern understanding of photosyn-ppm. thesis began when the Flemish researcher Jan Baptist There were also measurements, accurate to within 3%, van Helmont took up Cusa’s challenge (stated in the “Deof 375.00 ppm in 1885 (Hempel in Dresden), 390.0 in Staticis” section of his Idiota de mente, The Layman:1866 (Gorup, Erlangen), and 416.0 in 1857 and 1858 (von About Mind) to weigh a plant and its soil before and afterGilm, Innsbruck). Ironically, although the 1940s increase growth. Van Helmont discovered (circa 1620) that thecorrelated with a period of average atmospheric warm- soil supporting a willow tree, which had grown to 169ing, Beck and others have shown that the warming pre- pounds in five years, had changed weight by less than aceded the increase in CO2 concentrations. few ounces. Whence did the solid mass of the tree derive? The data reviewed by Beck came mainly from the Ironically, Van Helmont, who had introduced the wordnorthern hemisphere, geographically spread from Alaska “gas” to science, mistakenly concluded that the plant’sover Europe to Poona, India, nearly all taken from rural mass had come solely from the water applied.areas or the periphery of towns without contamination It took almost two more centuries to uncover theby industry, at a measuring height of approximately 2 astounding fact that much of the mass of the plant, andmeters above ground. Evaluation of chemical methods all of its structural backbone, derives from the invisiblerevealed a maximum error of 3% down to 1% in the best and apparently weightless air, most especially the carboncases. dioxide component of it. That was the achievement of the By contrast, the measurements hoked up from ice revolution in chemistry launched by Lavoisier, andcores, show a rather steady increase in CO2 levels, conve- pushed forward by Gay-Lussac, Avogadro, Gerhardt, andniently corresponding to the preconceived idea that others at the beginning of the 19th Century. The ability toincreasing industrial activity has produced a steady CO2 place two invisible gases in a balance and compare theirincrease. As Beck’s collaborator, Dr. Zbigniew weights, proved to be the secret to the determination ofJaworowski, former senior adviser to the Polish radiation atomic weights, and from that the unlocking of themonitoring service and a veteran mountaineer who has secrets of both the atom and the cell.excavated ice from 17 glaciers on six continents, has Unfortunately for the liars at the IPCC, the measure-shown, the gaseous inclusions in ice cores have no valid- ment of atmospheric CO2 concentration had been a spe-ity as historical proxies for atmospheric concentrations. cial focus of chemists since that early 19th Century elab-The continual freezing, refreezing, and pressurization of oration of the process of photosynthesis, and their care-ice columns drastically alters the original atmospheric fully recorded measurements remain with us. The incon-concentrations of the gas bubbles. [fn. 2] venient truth is that Al Gore still exists, but only fools and According to the greenhouse warming theory, the Presidential “front-runners,” so named for the ampleincrease of atmospheric CO2 concentration caused by leaks of bodily fluids from their anterior orifices, givehuman activity, such as burning of fossil fuels, acts like serious credence to his emissions. ––––––––––the glass in a greenhouse to prevent the re-radiation of 1.“180 years accurate CO2 air gas analysis by chemical methodssolar heat from near the Earth’s surface. Although such (short version),” an unofficial extract, Dipl. Biol. Ernst-Georg Beck,an effect exists, carbon dioxide is low on the list of green- Merian-Schule Freiburg, 8/2006 http://www.warwickhughes.com/house gases, accounting for at most 2 or 3 percent of the agri/BeckCO2short.pdfgreenhouse effect. By far the most important greenhouse 2. (see “Ice Core Data Show No Carbon Dioxide Increase” bygas is water vapor. However, water in the form of clouds Zbigniew Jaworowski and other references at http://www.21stcen-can reflect back solar radiation, causing temperature turysciencetech.com under topic “Global Warming.”)LaRouche PAC www.larouchepac.com On the Internet: call toll-free: 1-800-929-7566 Boston, MA 617-350-0040 Hackensack, NJ 201-441-4888 Norfolk, VA 757-587-3885 Seattle, WA 206-417-2363Washington, D.C. 202-393-1470 Chicago, IL 773-404-4848 Houston, TX 713-541-2907 Oakland, CA 510-251-2518Northern Virginia 703-779-2150 Detroit, MI 313-592-3945 Los Angeles, CA 323-259-1860 Philadelphia, PA 610-734-7080Baltimore, MD 410-747-3817 Paid for by the Lyndon LaRouche PAC, P.O. Box 6157, Leesburg, VA 20178. www.larouchepac.com and Not Authorized by Any Candidate or Candidate’s Committee

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *