Electronic Harassment, Electonic Stalking, Voice To Skull, TSCM Detection, Wiretapping, Listening To You

2015. 05. 14. Electronic Harassment, Electonic Stalking, Voice to Skull, TSCM detection, Wiretapping, Listening to you Electronic Harassment Protection | Electronic Stalking | Voice to Skull | V2K | Electronic Eavesdropping Detection | Anti­Surveillance Services Bug Detection | Counter Electronic Harassment | Gang Stalking       PRODUCTS TO PROTECT YOURSELF  AGAINST ELECTRONIC HARASSMENT! 1­(773) 775­7600         CALL US AT: http://www.specialsol.com/Counterharassmentproducts.htm 1/20 2015. 05. 14. Electronic Harassment, Electonic Stalking, Voice to Skull, TSCM detection, Wiretapping, Listening to you 1­(773) 775­7600  For direct and private ordering and delivery!   Whole House/Office Plug Neutralizer Protection from EMF (Electro­Magnetic Field), EMR (Electro­Magnetic Radiation) ……………..$149.00   Electronic Harassment EMF’s are emitted from almost every household electronic device. These EMF’s have been proven to potentially cause a variety of diseases in the body. The Whole House Neutralizer contains a natural compound made up of paramagnetic materials found straight from the earth that neutralizes the negative effects of household EMF’s on the human body. The neutralization of these EMF’s can greatly enhance the environment in which you work, play and live with loved ones. The Whole House Neutralizer is intended for use in any home. It covers up to 5,000 sq. ft., neutralizing the EMF;s coming from all electrical devices plugged into the inside of outside of the home. You home’s built in wiring system lets the Whole House Neutralizer power through your house without using any electricity and neutralizing every device plugged into any outlet. i.e. microwave, TV, computer, telephones, refrigerator, eavesdropping devices and other forms of electronic devices to due you harm etc. Simply plug The Whole House Neutralizer into any outlet in your home and it will begin neutralizing the harmful effects of EMF’s and radiation, to any EMF emitting device that is plugged in to the electrical outlets. Most people notice a difference in how they feel a few days after plugging it in. (less tired, more energy, fewer or no headaches) L Features: ▪ Will cover up to 5,000 sq ft ­ single or multi­story ▪Uses no electricity ▪Neutralizes all EMF emitting electric devices that are plugged in ▪Utilizes your house’s wiring to protect you from outside EMF’s ▪Will last a lifetime if taken care of ▪Most people notice a difference after a couple of days ▪Affordable whole house protection NOTE: The color may be yellow or gray.   RADIATION BLOCKING HEADBAND Using 99.9% Pure Silver and Comfortable Stretch The perfect way to shield your ears. Comfortable enough to sleep in, and stylish enough to wear in public. High anti­radiation performance Silver stretch fabric gives excellent radiofrequency and microwave shielding. Made of double thickness 2″ wide 71% polyamide + 29% elastomer fiber. Ideal for cellphone shielding or anyhttp://www.specialsol.com/Counterharassmentproducts.htm 2/20 2015. 05. 14. Electronic Harassment, Electonic Stalking, Voice to Skull, TSCM detection, Wiretapping, Listening to you other activity when you need to shield your ears and forehead. Thin enough to fit under  a  hat  or  helmet.  Durable  and  unwrinkleable,  washable  too  (no  bleach). Silver  provides  anti­bacterial  properties  and  suppresses  odor.  Folds  small  for easy transport. Pretty Silver color. Radiation Blocking Headband (Cat. #A218) …………… $44.95     IS SOMEONE LISTENING AND  TRACKING YOU?           Bug Finder Pro­96 (Locates Eavesdropping Audio and Video Camera Spy Devices!……$99.00 This anti­spy full­frequency detector can detector the hidden GSM device cellphone camera and other hidden camera around you. It is multi­angle adjustable, keep wide range detection, and detect precisely. Low­voltage prompts, built­in rechargeable battery. The windows hole can be seen through to find all the cameras that are facing you. Auto­ detection, when detect the hidden camera, it will vibrate to tell you. With a signal strength indicator lights that can quickly find the signal source Adjustable sensitivity, high sensitivity to find the camera in wide scope, and reduce the sensitivity to detect in a small detection range.   Specifications: 1.Detection mode: 1.Laser detection, 2.Vibration (Mute) detection, 3.Beep detection, 4.LED display detection. 5. Headset 2.Wireless Sweep: frequency detection range (1MHz­6 5GHz) 3.Laser detection Camera distance of 10cm­10meters (the naked eye can identify red flashing) 4.Radio detection of camera range 5cm­l0meters (according to the camera transmit power distance)                      Power in the 50mv­200mv detection range 30­50cm         Power in the 300mv­600mv detection range 100­200cm         Power in the 80gray­1200my detection range 300­800cm         Power Built­in lithium polymer battery 450mAH 5.Current Consumption: 8mA 6.Probe laser wavelength of 920nm 7.Receive frequency range: 1MHz­6500MHz 8.Special dedicated optical lens filters 9.Matedal: ABS 10.Size: 93mm x 48mm x 17mm Application: office room, conference, shown, movie hall, house room, in the car, in some confidential places.  http://www.specialsol.com/Counterharassmentproducts.htm 3/20

DeepBlackLies

DeepBlackLies Bringing in-depth reporting of crime and corruption in high places____________________________________________________________________   Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence by John J. McMurtrey, M. S.[a], Copyright 2003, 23 Dec. 2003[b] People discerning remote manipulation by technology capable of such influence have formed protest organizations across the world.[1] [2] [3] [4] Educated society is uninformed regarding authentic documentation of the development and existence of these technologies, and unaware of the dangers. Complaint of ‘hearing voices’ and perception of other remote manipulation must receive appropriate scientific and legal investigation with protection. Professional awareness is virtually absent with eminent texts and opinion being presumptuous, without appraisal of the evidence.Herein is substantiated:1. Human wireless internal voice transmission and tracking technologies.2. Reports of electroencephalographic (EEG) thought reading capacity, evidence of covertdevelopment, and remote EEG capture technology.3. References to the use of these, or similar technologies against humans.MICROWAVE HEARINGThe first American[c] [5] to publish on the microwave hearing effect was Allan H. Frey in 1962,[6] yet radar technicians had anecdotes of microwave perception in World War II.[7] Deaf andnormal subjects, even with earplugs, can hear appropriately pulsed microwaves at least up tothousands of feet from the transmitter.[8] Transmitter parameters above those producing theeffect result in a severe buffeting of the head with dizziness and nausea, while parametersbelow the effect induce a pins and needles sensation. Peak power is the major determinant ofloudness, though there is some dependence on pulse width. Pulse modulation appears toinfluence pitch and timbre. The effect “is the most easily and reliably replicated of low powerdensity (microwave) illumination.” [9] Review of human and animal microwave hearingconfirmation by independent investigators of the effect establishes validity.[10] [11] [12] [13][14] Designs for scaring birds away from aircraft or other hazards by microwave hearing[15]and induction of vertigo[16] exist.[17] [18]While working for the Advanced Research Projects Agency at Walter Reed Army Institute ofResearch, Sharp and Grove discovered “receiverless” and “wireless” voice transmission. [19]Their method was simple: the negative deflections of voiceprints from recorded spokennumbers were caused to trigger microwave pulses. Upon illumination by such verballymodulated energy, the words were understood remotely. The discovery’s applications are”obviously not limited to therapeutic medicine” according to James C. Lin in MicrowaveAuditory Effects and Applications.[20]A Defense Intelligence Agency review of Communist literature affirmed microwave sound andindicated voice transmission. The report states, “Sounds and possibly even words whichappear to be originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation atvery low average power densities.” [21] Among microwave weapon implications are “greatpotential for development into a system for disorientating or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel.” An Army Mobility Equipment Research and DevelopmentCommand report affirms microwave speech transmission with applications of “camouflage,decoy, and deception operations.” [22] “One decoy and deception concept presently beingconsidered is to remotely create noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to lowpower, pulsed microwaves . . . By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speechmay be created” quotes the report.The Brunkan Patent # 4877027 “Hearing system” is a device capable of verbal microwavehearing. [23] The invention converts speech for remote introduction into the head by parabolicantenna with indication of direct microwave influence on neural activity. The microwavespectrum granted is broad: 100-10,000 MHz (0.1-10 GHz.) Pulse characteristics are essential toperception. Bursts of narrowly grouped, evenly spaced pulses determine sound intensity bytheir amount per unit time. Although a wide spectrum is patented, with ranges of pulse andburst duration, preferred operation has burst duration at 2 microseconds, and pulse duration at100 nanoseconds. Operation is at 1000 MHz, which is the frequency of optimal tissuepenetration.[24] Another patent application based on microwave bursts is “designed in such away that the burst frequencies are at least virtually equal to the sound frequencies of thesounds picked up by the microphone,” though the transducer here is not remote.[25]Stocklin Patent # 4858612 “Hearing device” 7 affirms the microwave hearing effect. Stocklingives exposition to the concept that a microwave component is part of neurophysiology andelectroencephalogram (EEG) potentials.[26] Microwaves are considered both emitted andabsorbed by nerve cell membrane proteins. Microwaves generally excite the brain[27] perhapsby influencing calcium,[28] a central ion in nerve firing.[29] Stocklin represents the auditorycortex as normally producing microwave energy, which the device simulates, thus elicitingsound sensation. Each acoustic tone is weighted for several microwave frequencies by aformula called the mode matrix, which is used to calculate best perception requirements.Observation of EEG desynchronization, delta waves, and brain wave amplitudes helps calibratethe device.[30] The lowest frequency for hearing is estimated by the cephalic index. Microwavespeech transmission in this patent is unremote with the antenna over and sized for the auditorycortex. Other patents have non-remote transducers of radiowave elicited hearing. [31] [32]Descriptions in the above patents attribute microwave hearing to direct neural influence.However, the most accepted mechanism in review is by thermoelastic expansion,12 most likelyinducing bone conducted hearing. The cochlea does appear to be involved, but not the middleear.14 This divergence of mechanism illustrates the non-thermal/thermal controversy. USexposure standards are based on thermal effects, yet there are effects very difficult to explainby thermodynamics.13 [33] All accept thermal effects at some level, yet the thermal onlyschool is rather dogmatic related to liability issues of commercial[34] and national securityconcern.[35] It must be said that the open literature regarding microwave hearing indicates athermo-acoustic mechanism.”Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect.” is the title of a small business contract forthe Department of Defense. Communication initial results are: “The feasibility of the concepthas been established” using both low and high power systems.[36] A Freedom of InformationAct (FOIA) request as to the project’s outcome met with denial on the part of the Air Force, onthe grounds that disclosure “could reasonably be expected to cause damage to nationalsecurity.” [37] Though the Air Force denied the FOIA disclosure, such a contract’s purpose iselaborated by the Air Force’s “New World Vistas” report: “It would also appear possible tocreate high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion andpsychological direction . . . . If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internalacoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible. Thus it may be possible to ‘talk’ toselected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.” [38] Robert Becker,whose eminence was enough to have been twice nominated for the Nobel Prize in biologicalelectromagnetic fields research, is more explicit: “Such a device has obvious applications incovert operations designed to drive a target crazy with “voices” or deliver undetectableinstructions to a programmed assassin.” [39]The above Army efforts had results. A microwave voice transmission non-lethal weapon isreferenced in the thesaurus of the Center for Army Lessons Learned, which is a militaryinstruction website.18 The military thesaurus entry lists analogous devices using “silentsound.” [d] [40]ULTRASOUND TRANSMISSION OF VOICE Internal voice capability, without discernment by others nearby. is also evident in ultrasound-based technology. Lowrey Patent # 6052336 “Apparatus and method of broadcasting audiblesound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier” clearly focuses on non-lethal weapon applicationagainst crowds or directed at an individual.[41] Communication is understood as an inner voicewith loss of the directional quality of sound perception. “Since most cultures attribute innervoices either as a sign of madness, or as messages from spirits or demons, both of which . . .evoke powerful emotional reactions”, quotes the Lowrey patent’s effect on people. Replayingspeech, with a delay impedes talking and causes stuttering. Normal brain wave patterns can bechanged (or entrained), which “may cause temporary incapacitation, intense feelings ofdiscomfort.” This technique is detailed by Monroe Patent # 5356368 “Method of and apparatusfor inducing desired states of consciousness”, with license to Interstate Industries and involvesan auditory replication of brainwave patterns to entrain the EEG as desired.[42]Norris Patent # 5889870 “Acoustic heterodyne device and method”, directionally producessound on interference (or heterodyning) of two ultrasound beams.[43] The cancellation leavesthe carried audible sound perceivable. The effect becomes apparent particularly within cavitiessuch as the ear canal. An individual readily understands communication across a noisy crowedroom without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or as reflectingfrom any surface.American Technology Corporation, which licensed this patent, has an acoustic non-lethalweapons technology,[44] a cooperative agreement with the Army Research & DevelopmentCommand,[45] and is working with numerous other government agencies.[46] Thecorporation’s Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRADTM) account for 60% of military sales, andhave integration into the Navy’s situational awareness & radar surveillance systems[47] withdeployment on naval vessels and fleet harbors.[48] A popular magazine writer describes thedevice’s inner nature of sound perception.[49] From separate references, non-lethal weaponstreatments affirm sound localization and individual ultrasound effect limitation[50] withobvious lack of nearby discernment;[51] the latter by a non-lethal weapons program director. Asimilar ultrasound method of limiting sound to one person, Audio Spotlight is marketed, withexhibition at Boston’s Museum of Science and the Smithsonian National Air & Space Museum.[52] Both the American Technology device and Audio Spotlight are discussed in an article withsome history of ultrasound acoustics, which has origins in sonar.[53] Other acoustic influencemethods may utilize ultrasound.[e] [54]TARGET TRACKING TECHNOLOGYThe maintenance of effects on people requires obstacle penetration and target tracking. Theseinternal voice capable energy forms penetrate obstruction and can be localized. Soundtransmission through enclosures is commonly experienced. An inaudible ultrasound highintensity carrier wave is unnoticed. Solid defect inspection is one use of ultrasound, which isbeing developed to discern movement through walls.[55] Common technology utilizes themicrowave hearing spectrum, which partly or completely encompasses cell phone,[56] [57] TV,and radar frequencies. [58] Commercial signals are not perceived, since the hearing effectrequires pulsation within the limits that elicit perception. A variety of antennae localize thestructurally penetrating microwave illumination with collimation or focusing.[59] [60] A patent,”compatible for mobile platforms with DEWs,” (Directed Energy Weapons) includes a modifiedLuneburg lens emitting parallel rays with over 50 years utilization.[61]Hablov Patent # 5448501 “Electronic life detection system” is for microwave radar within thehearing spectrum that finds and distinguishes individuals through obstruction.[62] Therein isstated: “the modulated component of the reflected microwave signal . . . subjected tofrequency analysis . . . forms a type of “electronic fingerprint” of the living being withcharacteristic features, which . . . permits a distinction between different living beings.” Thoughthis patent has use in trapped victim rescue, another Hablov et. al. Patent # 5530429″Electronic surveillance system” detects interlopers with security emphasis.[63] Other literaturedescribes the basic method.[64]The Hablov et. al. patents discern people thru structures by vital organ motion, but others offermore detailed imaging. Fullerton et. al. Patent # 6400307 “System and method for intrusiondetection using a time domain radar array” is such a design,[65] and is commercially availableas RadarVision by Time Domain. [66] Further designs for imaging within structures include: aportable system determining suspect distance,[67] and presentations by the InternationalSociety for Optical Engineering.[68] [69] Software for displaying radar detection on a personal

Deborah Tavares Interview With Barrie Trower

http://www.stopthecrime.net/Deborah%20Tavares%20Interview%20with%20Barrie%20Trower.pdf Deborah Tavares Interview with Barrie Trower _____________________________________________________________________________________ Barrie Trower’s background and personal warning in his own words “In the very early 1960’s I trained with the government microwave warfare establishment. I looked at all aspects of microwave warfare and when I finished my time in the military, because I had a lot of expertise in the microwave field, I was asked if I would carry on with this research. We are in a new Cold War and this is why countries are developing this. And this is why all the microwave transmitters are going up everywhere because somebody, if they wanted to, could use them for other effects. The system is up and running. Years ago our government said to our scientists when it comes to microwaves you will only talk about things to do with heat, and that is it. So they won’t even discuss anything else. They will deny anything that doesn’t have anything to do with heat. They even deny all their 40 years of research leading up to this, although they’ve said that this can cause cancer and all the damage, they say no it can’t. We’re only looking at heat and heat is all that matters. So for the last 40 years the English government has been lying to the people. And the American, the Canadian, the Australian, they have been lying. They have been lying to protect industry, to protect their profits, to protect themselves from lawsuits. So they are really just liars and it is provable, sanctioned by the World Health Organization, without a shadow of a doubt. It is the same people that sit on the ICNAP certificate, sit on our government health protection agencies, sit on the World Health Organization… it is the same people. There are probably no more than 20 of them. But, yes, they are going to, in my opinion, commit the worst genocide this planet has ever known, not just people, but animals and plants. They are probably going to cause more destruction than a global war, and in several hundred years time, people will look back, whoever survives, and look at what we tried to do to stop them.” _____________________________________________________________________________________Deborah Tavares: Hello. This is Deborah Tavares with StoptheCrime.net and I’m here with BarrieTrower from the UK and we’re going to be talking about specifically this document today which was found onthe White House website, and it is entitled Realizing the Full Potential of Government Held Spectrum to SpurEconomic Growth. And it says President’s Council of Advisors on Science Technology, dated July 20, 2012.Now we’re quite honored to have an opportunity to discuss this document with Barrie today. And a little bitabout Barrie: he is, of course, visiting the United States right now from the UK and in the very early 60’s hewas trained in microwave warfare by the microwave warfare establishment. And when he finished the time thathe spent in the military, he had a lot of expertise in that field and he was asked to carry on with this research.And it was a new cold war that he discovered with microwaves. Would you would like to add anything to that?Barrie Trower: Only that microwaves from the 50’s were used as a stealth weapon as they still are today, onlythey’re obviously much, much more sophisticated. The 50’s was really a trial time where different countries werejust using people who had no choice, prisoners, psychiatric patients, dissidents, and they would just beam peoplewith this and see how long it takes this pulse frequency to have any effect. And if it does, we try a different typeof group. There were 25 different categories of people including children and pregnant women. Twenty-fivedifferent categories, and so from the 50’s, 60’s, 70’s, 80’s we’ve been developing microwave weapons right up totoday and they are incredibly sophisticated today. So if any government says that microwaves have no effect onyou, the question is then why have you been spending billions upon billions of dollars with the military for thelast sixty years improving them?Deborah Tavares: In this document, Barrie, it has listed a number of experts that are involved in thisparticular technology, and I can name a few of those experts now. They’re called the Key Members andSpectrum Experts. And they would include, and not be limited to, Stanford University, because, of course, manyuniversities are involved in this technology that are funded by the military. But the White House SpectrumManagement team is Google, Microsoft, Stanford and Harvard Universities. And I want to draw the attention ~1~ to Harvard University as being one of the universities involved in the origination of Silent Weapons, Quiet WarsTechnical Manual that is on StoptheCrime.net, but also Virginia Tech, UC Berkeley, the NationalCommunications and Telecommunications Association, the FCC and NSA, and many others that are involvedin this as well.So as we go through this, Barrie, I would like for you to explain some of what you see in this document, if youwould. It’s thirteen pages, and they’re talking about what the purpose of the spectrum is and if we could just flipthrough it slowly… each portion represents one page that is on our website.Barrie Trower: One of the things you said, the universities, for instance, they may not be guilty. And I cangive you an example. The government holds massive amounts of funds for research and the universities applyfor research grants. Now to give you one example in the United States, the government asked one university if itcould devise a method whereby if you beamed microwaves into somebody’s ears the vibrational frequencies inthe cochlea, they would actually produce sound in the person head so nobody else around could hear, just theone person being beamed could hear the sound. And the University was told this would aid the deafenormously because people could talk into a device and they would just hear it straight through. It was alsopicked up by the super store manufacturers who said we could also use this for good because if we haveshoplifters, we can beam the pulse frequencies to the shoplifters to say, “You’re being watched. Put this down.”We’ll prevent crime, and that was used for good. It didn’t take people very long, especially the military and othersuper stores to think, ‘well, hang on, we can use this for our own devices’. So the military can now put voicesinto people’s heads to do whatever deed they wish it to achieve, and the super stores have also realized thatrather than say ‘put that down, you’re going to steal it’ , if you’re indecisive and you’re shopping, they can say‘you really do want to buy this.’ And after nine months, I got the figure from one of your calls, somebody tookone of your super stores to court for beaming them. And they made a phenomenal profit in just nine months,phenomenal profit. But because your Federal Communications Committee says that microwaves were safe, thecase fell.So all I’m saying is that when you’re reading out the universities, they may be acting totally innocently and itmay be that the recipients, after the research is done, say now we will turn this to our advantage.Deborah Tavares: And that’s because so much is compartmentalized and that’s how they keep this monsterescalating to the degree that they are.Barrie Trower: Yes. It’s perception.Deborah Tavares: Absolutely. What I find so true in the Silent Weapons document is that they talk about“the real and the stated goals.” And we’re saying what the real goals are but what they tell us is what the statedgoals are. So we’re buying a lot of these advancements in technology based on what sounds good as a statedgoal, but then there’s the real goal. And I think that, as a global population, when you look at the Silent Weaponsprotocol, that 44-page document that we spoke about just a bit ago, we can see that this is a well plannedprogram overall by a few, and so certainly while many are unaware, a few are; the most wealthy, knowledgeable,the ones in the technologies, to carry this out without our knowledge or consent.Barrie Trower: This is from a program in 1976. I can tell you by its title that it was a program in 1976because in 1976 your government produced a list of all of the illnesses that you can develop from continuouslow-level microwave radiation, everything, physiological, neurological illnesses. But in the same document thatwas released under the Freedom of Information Act, and I referenced it in my latest paper that I’m readingfrom tonight. If you get a copy of that paper, it’s referenced in that. But what your government also did that wasrather naughty; they asked all the other governments in the world, the influential governments in the world,basically to deceive the public. And they were to deceive the public really for two reasons. The first is to avoidlaw suits, and the second was to protect industrial profit. ~2~ Deborah Tavares: So the bottom line is massive corporate profit.Barrie Trower: And your government printed it and I’ve written it down. They say that, basically, the publicmust be deceived to protect industrial profit and this is here, it’s in the title, Economic Growth.Deborah Tavares: That’s exactly right and also in the Silent Weapons document, which you’re well aware of,they also talk about the key to global control is through energy. And we see that happening now with thefrequencies and the microwaves. It’s all energy. We’re energy. And they want to control it all, even us.Barrie Trower: There is a counter argument. I deliberately do not take sides. I look at arguments from bothsides and I decide myself who I think is right and wrong. But a counter argument that I do not accept from theEnglish or the American governments, is that enemy countries are also developing this technology. I know fortycountries that are developing this. And their argument is that if other countries are developing this technology,we have to develop it in order to defeat it. Okay so far, but I don’t go along with the argument that you must useyour own people for experiments. So they are using Americans for experiments.There are forty some countries developing this technology and the governments argue that for combat, if thewaves were used on the United States, the United States would know exactly what to look for, they would knowthe frequencies, they can jam them. And I can go along with that. We pay governments to protect us. What Icannot go along with is the fact that 25 categories of persons without their choice and in many cases withouttheir knowledge, are being experimented upon with these particular frequencies to cause all of this. That iswrong.Deborah Tavares: What we understand is that minimally there is a 50-year advancement of technologiesthat are out there ahead of time that we’re not even aware exist right now.Barrie Trower: No. No. You can’t have technology 50 years hence. You can have ideas 50 years hence. Youcannot have technology 50 years hence because the world can’t keep that many secrets. I go to countries all overthe world. I go to countries that despise the United States and I go to countries that love the United States. I goto countries that are at war with countries I’ve just left. And I really don’t take a stand for or against anybody.But the scientific community that I talk with at these conferences, they often say to me, ‘if you go to this country,please warn them about this’. Scientists, in the whole, do not want mass genocide. They do not want totalgovernment control because they have families and children and grandchildren and great grandchildren. And alot of the help that I get are from talking virtually all night to international scientists who say ‘well, we’ve donethis’ and they will also say ‘well we’ve done that’ and if you put these two together it agrees with what ‘he’ says.Scientists talk and 50 years hence, it wouldn’t be kept secret. The ideas can be there, but the knowledge which Ihave today of where we are at the moment cannot be exceeded because we do not have the people that clever toexceed it.Deborah Tavares: Would you say that as far as the microwave targeting of mass populations now, which iswhat this is showing (holds White House document up), is the intention where we were talking about morespecific targeted people hundreds of thousands globally?Barrie Trower: Yes.Deborah Tavares: Now we’re looking at a map that really does show a mass targeting particularly of theUnited States?Barrie Trower: Oh yes. Absolutely. Really this is one of the ideas behind the Smart Meter where they putthem on everybody’s homes. What they can do now? They can watch every single person in that house. Theycan watch you go to bed. They can watch what you’re doing in bed. They can watch you on the toilet and in thebath. They can hear every single word you’re saying. They have a machine which will measure your hormone ~3~

Controle Físico Da Mente V1 3

Acesse o site:https://sites.google.com/site/controlemental Controle Físico da Mente Versão 1.3 Acesse o site: https://sites.google.com/site/controlemental Controle Físico da Mente ÍndiceCONTROLE FÍSICO DA MENTE ………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Controle Físico da Mente…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Ativação de Reações Motoras…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Atores do Controle Remoto da Mente …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 9 Biometria por EEG Remoto……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11 Como Desativar o Controle Remoto da Mente……………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 Gang Stalking ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 19 Modelo P300………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 Padrão de comportamento ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23 Produção de Tortura Eletrônica ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 23 Estudo de Caso – Mais Alguns sintomas ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24 Notas sobre Tortura ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 25 Produção de Transtorno de Personalidade ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 26 Produção de Imagens Cerebrais………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 27 Voz Intracraniana……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 29 Histórico do Controle Remoto do Cérebro …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 32 Histórico nos EUA………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 33 Mídia…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 34 Aparelho de EEG Remoto Comercial………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 35 Controle Físico da MenteControle Físico da Mente Controle Físico da Mente Bem Vindo ao Site (version in English) (versión en Español) As funções do seu cérebro podem ser monitoradas e alteradas a distância através de EEG por radar “Pode-se monitorar remotamente a atividade elétrica do cérebro, de regiões inteiras ou de partes selecionadas, através da transmissão e recepção de ondas eletromagnéticas a partir de um ponto remoto do cérebro alvo” (The individual components of the system for monitoring and controlling brain wave activity may be of conventional type commonly employed in radar systems)Este é um site que discute artigos científicos sobre o controle físico das funções mentais.O objetivo do site é publicar, divulgar e discutir temas e tecnologias utilizadas no controle físico dasfunções mentais humanas.Aqui você poderá fazer downloads de livros e artigos, bem como publicar seus artigos e opiniõessobre o tema.O controle físico das funções mentais pode ser feito a distância, através do EEG por Radar.(Victorian, Armen: “Neural manipulation by remote radar, published in Lobster No. 30).Por isso, atualmente não é mais necessário a utilização de eletrodos para captar as variaçõeselétricas do cérebro.As funções cerebrais que podem ser ativadas a distância, incluem:As chamadas Voice-to-skull (vozes direto no cérebro ou telepatia sintética*) através do cortéx auditivo;Produção de Imagens Cerebrais (produzir imagens direto no cérebro, e gerar sonhos vívidos);Dor mental (choques cerebrais, sensação de choque eletrico e corrente elétrica no corpo);Produção de dor física a partir de estímulo elétrico cerebral (dor de dente, dor muscular, dor de estomago, etc);Produção de luzes cintilantes (fosfenos) e produção de sensações de presença fantasma por ativação da junçãotemporoparietal esquerda;O Coração (pode ser paralisado, retardado ou acelerado pela estimulação adequada de determinadas estruturas corticaise subcorticais);Os Movimentos Respiratórios (o ritmo e a amplitude podem ser controlados remotamente);A Secreção e a Motilidade Gástrica;As Funções Mentais (fluxo do pensamento, controle da linguagem, agressividade);As Funções Sensoriais (ouvir os sons e ver as imagens produzidas pelo cérebro alvo através do cortex auditivo, e 1

C.B. Baker New World Order And E.L.F Psychotronic Tyranny (1992)

New World Order and E.L.F. Psychotronic Tyranny By C.B. Baker It is completely clear that the state which is first to create such weapons will achieve incomparable superiority.” — Major I. Chernishev, Russian army[1] From Youth Action Newsletter In his September 21, 1992 speech to the United Nations, PresidentGeorge Bush announced that foreign troops, would occupy America and train for a New World Order Army. He stated: “Nations should develop and train military units for possible U.N. peacekeeping operations. … If multinational units are to work together, they must train together. … Effective multinational action will also require coordinated command & control and inter-operability of both equipment and communications.” “…WE MUST CHANGE OUR NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS if we are to change our international relations. … THE UNITED STATES IS PREPARING TO MAKE AVAILABLE OUR BASES AND FACILITIES FOR MULTI-NATION TRAINING AND FIELD EXERCISES. One such base, with facilities is Fort Dix, N.J.” President Bill Clinton has continued and expanded George Bush’s surrender-America policy. As a result, increasing numbers of foreign troops, including Russian Spetsnaz, along with vast amounts of foreign military equipment are now entering the United States to serve as a U.N. OCCUPATION force. On May 3, 1994, President Clinton signed an Executive Order Presidential Decision Directive (originally numbered PPD-13, later changed to PPD-25) that places U.S. troops under U.N. command and abolished the law limiting the number of U.S. troops that can be committed to the U.N. without approval of Congress. PPD-25 also created special funding for U.N. peacekeeping and occupation forces, that permits an UNLIMITED drain upon the U.S. Treasury. American Tax payers will be forced to pay any amount demanded by the U.N. occupation forces. The Judas attitude of the Administration is symbolized in an article written by Bill Clinton’s very close friend, Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, titled: “The Birth of the Global Nation.” Talbott strongly attacked American national sovereignty, stating: “NATIONAL AS WE KNOW IT WILL BE OBSOLETE: ALL STATES WILL RECOGNIZE A SINGLE, GLOBAL” (666) “AUTHORITY,” (720/92 Time Magazine). Acting under U.N. occupation orders, U.S. military and national guardforces are now being trained to attack civilians in this country. In Alaska,contingents of Russian military OCCUPATION FORCES are reported to have already landed. State and Federal forces, have begun house-to- house surveys, looking for gun collectors and checking attitudes for possible patriotic resistance.A number of citizens have already been illegally detained. The 101494 WASHINGTON TIMES reported that U.S. Marines in California had to fill out a “Combat Arms Survey” that asked 39 questions about attitude to determine if AMERICAN MARINES WERE WILLING TO SERVETHE NEW WORLD ORDER TRAITORS AND FIGHT AGAINST THEIR OWN FELLOW CITIZENS. Marines were asked to give their attitudes on the treason statement: “I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve in the forces whichmaintain world peace and EVERY Nation’s way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their service.” The last item on the survey asked the Marines’ attitude about the statement: “I WOULD FIRE UPON U.S. CITIZENS, WHO REFUSED OR RESIST CONFISCATION OF FIREARMS BANNED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT.”As more Russian and United Nations occupation troops enter the United States, the White House is expecting strong resistance from loyal Americans. To QUIETLY suppress these patriotic fighters, President Clinton is getting help from the old Soviet KGB.Moscow is now supplying Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno with a whole new class of weapons, that will be specifically TARGETED AGAINST AMERICAN CIVILIANS. The controlled U.S. media has labeled these so-called “NON-LETHAL WEAPONS.” A close inspection of the facts about these new anti- civilian devices, reveals that they are SOVIET PSYCHOTRONIC WEAPONS, which are very dangerous and they can also be extremely lethal. The 3193 issue of Time Magazine reported: “American and Russians are discovering common interest…MIND CONTROLTECHNOLOGY. Former KGB General George Kotov has told Americanvisitors about Russian (KGB) research into ‘acoustic psycho-correction.’ The process involves transmitting commands into the subconscious of targeted victims through static or white-noise bands. The Jan. 11-17, 1993 issue of DEFENSE NEWS reported that U.S. political and military officials are obtaining Soviet mind-control technology. The Soviet KGB “capability, demonstrated in a series of laboratory experiments dating back to the mid-1970’s, could be used to suppress riots, CONTROL DISSIDENTS, demoralize or disable opposing forces and enhance the performance of friendly special operations teams, sources say.””Pioneered by the government-funded Department of Psycho-Correction at the Moscow Medical Academy, acoustic psycho-correction involves the transmission of specific commands via static or white noise bands into the human subconscious without upsetting other intellectual functions.Experts said laboratory demonstrations have shown encouraging results after exposure of less than one minute. Moreover, decades of KGB research and investment of untold millions of rubles in the process has produced THE ABILITY TO ALTER BEHAVIOR ON WILLING AND UNWILLING SUBJECTS, the experts add.” One of the KGB’s psychotronic systems was being sold for as little as$80,000. A scientific analysis published by an affiliate of the Department